Friday, June 8, 2012

Changing the Game Play: Time to Feel Empowered


Posted: 06/07/2012 5:18 pm

"If you never change your mind, why have one?" -- Edward de Bono
There is a story that is told about a wandering stranger who once stopped a king in the street. Furious, the king shouted, "How dare you, a man of little worth, interrupt the progress of your sovereign?"
The stranger answered: "Can you truly be a sovereign if you cannot even fill my begging bowl?" And he held out his bowl to the king. In wishing to show his generosity to the crowd that had now assembled, the king ordered the stranger's begging bowl to be filled with gold.
But no sooner had the bowl appeared to be full of gold coins than they disappeared and the bowl seemed empty once again. Sack after sack of gold coins was brought, and still the begging bowl devoured them all. "Stop," screamed the king, "this trick of yours is emptying my treasury!"
"Perhaps to you I am emptying your treasury," said the stranger, "but to others I am merely illustrating a truth."
"And what truth is this?" asked the king.
"The truth is that the bowl is the desires of humankind, and the gold is what humanity is given. There is no end to humanity's capacity to devour, without being in any way changed. See, the bowl has eaten nearly all your wealth, but it is still an empty piece of carved old wood, which has not partaken of the nature of gold in any respect."
Our old ways of doing things are devouring both the world and our own sense of worth without affecting real change within us. Observing our current epoch, with its varied ideological and political conflict, mental conditioning, and strife among peoples and nations, it appears that our collective body is in a state of global psychosis. This state we find ourselves collectively a part of is a reflection of our perceptions and current modes of consciousness. The state of our human consciousness is different today from how it was in our distant past.
Our far human ancestors exhibited a magical-mythical mode of consciousness, where the world around them existed together as a vibrant matrix of connected, living energies. It appears that this mode of consciousness participates in correspondence with the flow of matter-reality, both organic and inorganic. They may not have been self-conscious of this model, yet it was an interpretation of reality where consciousness was primary, and all of life was magically woven together.
Western science, which for the last millennia has asserted itself as the dominant hegemony, has been at pains to stress that matter is primary and that consciousness is a secondary by-product from our mental activity. This emphasis upon the primacy of matter promotes a materialistic reality and lifestyle.
The modern worldview that denies the primacy of consciousness is fostering forms of human alienation, both psychological and social. Yet human beings, as social creatures, are in need of meaning and significance in their lives as much as they are in need of air to breathe and food to eat. It is a great paradox that modern science (human consciousness) has produced a view of the cosmos that has no room for consciousness.
The tragedy of humankind may be that it has almost no suspicion of how the collective psyche is contaminated through exploitative use of mythological images, collective stereotypes, and subconscious signifiers that play upon our perceptions. The result is that we have now arrived at a critical time in our socio-cultural evolution, with all focus and attention placed externally onto physical trappings, material gains, and security fears.
Any society or civilization that makes the material world its sole pursuit and object of concern cannot but devolve in the long run. Such misappropriation of perspective is partly responsible in creating the present chaotic situation of our world.
We need to make our mental focus and conscious potential a part of our everyday experience. This includes being conscious of the type of impacts we receive and to avoid those impacts and influences that are negative. We should each take responsibility to seek out exposure to more positive forms of influence. For example, words and expressions of perennial truth encourage us -- they give us strength because we instinctively recognize truthfulness. Our physical body unconsciously reacts to this as through the form of galvanic skin response, pupil response, or through our electrical nerve responses. In short, our body feels the essence of what impacts us, and negative or false information weakens us. This concept was researched scientifically through testing muscle strength. Dr. David Hawkins* has written extensively on how muscle testing shows that various impacts create either strong or weak reactions from the body. In his work he relates how people who listened to lies proved to exhibit a weakened muscle reaction, whilst those who listened to positive words and statements showed a strong muscle response. Dr. Hawkins's research found that particular lower energy "attractors," which serve as negative energy depleting emotions, are shame, guilt, apathy, grief, fear, desire, anger and pride. Higher energy attractors are the welfare or positive emotions such as courage, willingness, acceptance, reason, love, and joy. However, he also notes that more than 99 percent of humans calibrate below the level of Joy. Now, this is something that surely needs to be changed.
We need to take charge of how we participate in the life-reality around us. We should not be afraid to say NO to insane conditions and demands. We need to accept the possibility of inner evolution (work on ourselves) and the larger potential for conscious evolution as a species. It is time to change the game plan: to be conscious and mindful of our interactions, our perceptions, and our emotions. We need to recognize we often live our lives within a distracting social milieu, and therefore the imperative that exists to shift to a positive understanding of our inherent capacities and strength. In other words, to feel empowered and not powerless, to possess an inner confidence that allows us also to work in our external environments in the ways most appropriate.
The art of living with a vibrant human consciousness entails that we each bring a strong, creative energy from within us and project this, with intent and clear positive focus, upon our external environments.
It's time to stop playing their funny games and to begin taking responsibility for our own minds.
For more by Kingsley Dennis, Ph.D., click here.
For more on emotional intelligence, click here.
 

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Ray Bradbury -

I worked with Xana Bradbury, daughter of Ray Bradbury at Nixdorf Computer in Culver City in the 1980's. Godspeed, Ray 


June 6, 2012 10:42 AM

Ray Bradbury dead at 91

Topics
Books
(CBS/AP) Ray Bradbury, the writer best known for his dystopian novel "Fahrenheit 451," died Tuesday night in Los Angeles. He was 91.
Reached at Bradbury's home, his daughter, Alexandra Bradbury, says her father died Tuesday night in Southern California. She did not have additional details.
Bradbury had a lengthy career of writing everything from science-fiction and mystery to humor. He transformed his childhood dreams and Cold War fears into telepathic Martians, lovesick sea monsters, and a high-tech, book-burning future in "Fahrenheit 451."
He also scripted the 1956 film version of "Moby Dick'' and wrote for "The Twilight Zone.''
Bradbury's series of stories in "The Martian Chronicles'' was a Cold War morality tale in which events on another planet served as a commentary on life on this planet. It has been published in more than 30 languages.
"If I had to make any statement, it would be how much I love and miss him, and I look forward to hearing everyone's memories about him," Danny Karapetian, Bradbury's grandson, told science website io9. "He influenced so many artists, writers, teachers, scientists, and it's always really touching and comforting to hear their stories."

12 Photos

Ray Bradbury: 1920-2012

View the Full Gallery »

   

Saturday, June 2, 2012

Free Will Is an Illusion


Posted: 06/01/2012 12:50 pm

Research in neuroscience has revealed a startling fact that revolutionizes much of what we humans have previously taken for granted about our interactions with the world outside our heads: Our consciousness is really not in charge of our behavior.
Laboratory experiments show that before we become aware of making a decision, our brains have already laid the groundwork for it. In a recent book,Subliminal: How Your Unconscious Mind Rules Your Behavior, physicist Leonard Mlodinow reviews a wide range of psychological experiments that demonstrate the dominant role the unconscious plays in our behavior. This recognition challenges fundamental assumptions about free will and the associated religious teachings about sin and redemption, as well as our judicial concepts of responsibility and punishment. If our brains are making our decisions for us subconsciously, how can we be responsible for our actions? How can our legal system punish criminals or God punish sinners who aren't in full control of their decision-making processes?
Is free will an illusion? In his recent book titled Free Will, neuroscientist Sam Harris pulls no punches. He tells us in no uncertain terms: "Free will is an illusion." We don't exist as immaterial conscious controllers, but are instead entirely physical beings whose decisions and behaviors are the fully caused products of the brain and body.
Philosophers identify several different positions on the question of free will. Incompatibilists hold that free will is incompatible with determinism, the idea that our behavior is fully determined by antecedent causes such as fate, acts of God, or laws of nature. These split into two camps.Libertarians hold that we have free will since humans transcend cause and effect in ways that make us ultimately responsible. Determinists hold that we don't have free will because either determinism is true or indeterminism (randomness) doesn't give us control or responsibility. Both these groups are opposed by compatibilists, who argue that free will is compatible with determinism, or indeterminism for that matter.
What exactly is determinism? Two centuries ago, French physicist Pierre Laplace pointed out that, according to Newtonian mechanics, the motion of every particle in the universe can in principle be predicted from the knowledge of its position, momentum, and the forces acting on it. This is theNewtonian world machine. Since, as far as physics is concerned, we are all just particles, then this would seem to make free will an illusion indeed.
However, we now can say with considerable confidence that the universe is not a Newtonian world machine. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics showed that, deep down, nature is fundamentally indeterministic. But does quantum indeterminacy play an important role in the brain, and thus open a way for free will? Probably not, and here's why.
The moving parts of the brain are heavy by microscopic standards and move around at relatively high speeds because the brain is hot. Furthermore, the distances involved are large by these same microscopic standards. It is easy to demonstrate quantitatively that quantum effects in the brain are not significant. So, even though libertarians are correct that determinism is false at the microphysical, quantum level, the brain is for all practical purposes a deterministic Newtonian machine, so we don't have free will as they define it.
Although the brain is likely deterministic when it comes to the control of behavior, there's plenty of "pseudo-randomness" (as opposed to "pure" quantum randomness) in the thermal motions of our brains and in the environment that feeds us data. It's possible that this can provide sufficient uncertainty to give us the "feeling" of free will. Or, perhaps uncertainty plays no direct role and it is simply our lack of awareness about what causes our decisions that we interpret as being exempt from the causal laws of nature. Either way, this means that ultimately we do not have libertarian free will, even though we might be under the impression we do.
But here's some consolation. Even though at the quantum level there is no rigid determinism, the compatibilists are correct in viewing the operations of the brain as causal processes. They also make another good point when they argue that even if our thoughts and actions are the product of unconscious processes, they are still our thoughts and actions. In other words, "we" are not just our conscious minds, but rather the sum of both conscious and unconscious processes. While others can influence us, no one has access to all the data that went into the calculation except our unique selves. Another brain operating according to the same decision algorithms as ours would not necessarily come up with the same final decision since the lifetime experiences leading up to that point would be different.
So, although we don't have libertarian free will, if a decision is not controlled by forces outside ourselves, natural or supernatural, but by forces internal to our bodies, then that decision is ours. If you and I are not just some immaterial consciousness (or soul) but rather our physical brains and bodies, then it is still "we" who make our decisions. And after all, that's what the brain evolved to do, whatever role consciousness might play. And, therefore, it is "we" who are responsible for those decisions.
And that's what it all boils down to. Who cares whether we call an action "free will" or not? Calling it "free will" (as compatibilists do) is too confusing, since it suggests some form of dualism, supernatural or not; so let's call it "autonomy." The issue is: what is the moral and legal responsibility of an autonomous person, and how should society deal with wrongdoing?
Obviously, we cannot have a functioning society if we do not protect ourselves from people who are dangerous to others because of whatever it is inside their brains and nervous systems that makes them dangerous. Still, given that we don't have libertarian free will that sets us above causal laws, it would seem that our largely retributive moral and justice systems need to be re-evaluated, and maybe even drastically revamped.
 
FOLLOW SCIENCE

Collective Consciousness: A Study in Words

Collective Consciousness: A Study in Words

BC Culture Premium
    Collective consciousness or collective unconscious? It is a question for those working with consciousness studies. And is there a relationship between the collective consciousness and what we call higher consciousness? Or even cosmic consciousness?
    The phrases abound: quantum consciousness, universal consciousness, Christ consciousness.. What is consciousness itself? What about altered states of consciousness or consciousness raising or simply human consciousness?
    The word is ubiquitous in a society which has an unparalleled longing to understand its finer mechanisms. An awakening society. Is it merely wishful thinking to talk about 'collective consciousness 2012', or expanding consciousness? By collective consciousness do we mean shared consciousness? Is there a conscious collective? What about science and consciousness?
    When I wrote about this previously, in a piece called 'Consciousness and Its Alterations', I focused on the value of consciousness to the individual in relation to its possible modifications. But under the title of Collective Consciousness I wished to refer to something which is transcendental and healing, which invokes the archetypes of psychology and yet belongs in a child's paintbox. And that is the spiritual year.
    Nothing frames the mystery of human consciousness as adroitly as the inner calendar. Every religious and social grouping without exception has imbued the passage of the seasons with ritual and artistic significance. Without a doubt there is something we collectively and individually respond to in the rhythms of the year.
    On the one hand the inner aspect of this depends on your faith; on the other it is a matter of sensitivity to a universal or cosmic consciousness which expresses itself both in the mighty movements of the sun along the ecliptic and the changing color of a leaf. We are wealthy in the resources the world gives us. A child's joy reveals this; the awe-inspiring symbolism of death and rebirth in spring reveals this.
    I suggest, then, that by collective consciousness we mean something which is a trembling sensitivity and which expresses itself in generosity, love and communion. At best. At worst we slip into tribal and sectarian impulses which do the opposite. Of course evil can be conscious and individual too. But evil is essentially manipulative – it plays on the elements of society which have no wish to be awakened. The conscious charisma of evil itself is almost unimaginable. If we wished to we could talk about 'collective unconsciousness 2012'.
    Continued on the next pagePage 1 — Page 2
    Spread the word
    Bookmark and Share
    Profile image for jay-landar

    Article Author: Jay Landar

    Jay Landar is an author and storyteller living in Kilkenny, Ireland. He has written a number of books of poetry and stories. He is a regular visitor to schools and arts centers where he performs his work and gives workshops. …
    Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own


    Read more:http://blogcritics.org/culture/article/collective-consciousness-a-study-in-words/#ixzz1wgLikY00