Daniel A Briggs, PhD, released his meta-consciousness theory (MCT) to the public yesterday. Briggs proffers that MCT occurs during altered states of consciousness within the flux of electromagnetic brain plasma. He claims that this elevated state causes more than just a flux plasma (light-plasma production) observable on a MEG or EEG screen; he suggests that MCT causestransmuting events in the brain that alters neuron pathways and mental processing that transforms cognition, affect and behavioral outcomes. He claims that these transmuting events generally reflect changes (sometimes dramatic) in one’s 1) affect—attitudes, emotions, thoughts and feelings (which impact biochemical productions)—2) behavior—both reactionary and initiatory (which also impact biochemical productions)—and 3) thought processing (which also impact biochemical productions). These transmuting eventsproduce outcomes that facilitate improved relationships, improved fiscal conditions and improved health, both mental and physiological.
Briggs points out that the important thing to remember is that these developmental changes caused by transmuting events within the human brain accelerate the movement of the psyche toward ultimate morality, the highest elevated state of human consciousness. These transmuting events, at the quantum level (an event that leads to neuro-biological transformations), not only generate desirable post-event outcomes but are preceded by euphoric experiences of elation during the altered state of consciousness.
Briggs is tackling and unraveling one of the most complex and difficult areas of science research and study in modern times, the human consciousness. However, at present, even the most advanced and sophisticated brain scanning technology (MEG, EEG, etc.) is still far to crude to prove or disprove Briggs' theory empirically. Current devices can only detect the magnetic and electrical fields produced when the human brain thinks. Scientists seem to be able to observe theelectromagnetic brain plasma functioning in real time but are unable to dissect individual neurons in a living brain to observe the activity microscopically in real time. Therefore, science cannot determine how recall (neuron firing) actually works relative to thinking, perception, choices, conversation, feelings, emotions, etc., all of which are fundamental elements of human consciousness. It is not even known to science how long one's impression history is actually retained in the human brain or if "back-ups" are made before neurons deteriorate.